“19 Reasons It’s Horrible To Grow Up Gifted” is a fucking terrible headline

Ah, but it’s in a classic Business Insider Template Bullshit, so it works for them.

While they threw a dart on the wall and landed on 19 then proceeded to introduce each cherry picked Reddit comment with a stock photo and an encapsulating 3 word introductory sentence while managing to put it on a 20 click ad driven slideshow summed up in a sensation headline, we’ll throw it up on Tumblr highlighting what really needs to be highlighted—Problems unique to intellectually gifted individuals.

19 Reasons It’s Horrible To Grow Up Gifted

image

Wait, let’s just give quick credit to this header photo; Coloured Boy Playing Chess. It was not one of those outrageous ridiculous stereotypical stock photos of a baby Einstein with unnecessarily thick prescription glasses to emphasize genius, but of a boy playing chess. Let’s not subject this innocent little boy who has the future of the world in front of him by scaring the shit out of him as to why it’s horrible to be who he is. [(REUTERS/Gil Montano) (chess-player-young-kid.jpg)]

If you’re born gifted, life is handed to you on a silver platter, right?

Not according to several Reddit users who answered the question, “[For those] labeled as gifted children, do you think the label harmed you, or helped you?”

Most said that the “free passes” and special treatment given in school and beyond are not worth the price of having above-average IQ. In fact, any complacency they enjoyed during their early years ended up hurting them later in life.

“I often feel like a huge failure and I can’t look at my transcript without crying,” writes one user. “I still consider myself extremely intelligent and capable but I can’t push myself to do the work required to make straight As. Overall it’s forced me to set an unreasonably high standard for myself.”

We’ve pulled together some of the most interesting comments from the thread about why it’s horrible to grow up gifted.

From an early age, you believe it’s you vs. the world.

“You’re suddenly looking around at the world and realizing that you’re supposed to have some crazy work ethic at everything because YOU’RE gifted and THEY aren’t. More is expected of YOU than THEM because of the big giant brain that YOU were given that THEY weren’t. See a pattern there? There’s this exclusivity complex there where it’s an ‘Us vs. Them’ mentality.”

(RaptarIsTheShit, Reddit)

You develop a superiority complex.

“When you’ve been told all your life that you’re the smartest person in the room, you don’t take orders from others very well, especially those who you don’t find very bright (which, sadly, is most people).”

( RaptarIsTheShit, Reddit)

And that makes you arrogant.

“Harmed me. Made me an arrogant self-righteous prick, because I was taught for years that my classmates and I were smarter than all the rest of the school. I’m still trying to undo all that.”

(McHaven, Reddit)  

Inflated expectations also lead to a deep feeling of inadequacy.

“Being labeled as gifted caused my parents to have inflated expectations of me which I will never meet. I am quite happy with an undergraduate degree and career in business. My parents think I should be curing cancer while working on my 4th PhD.”

( Inspector VII, Reddit)

You put too much pressure on yourself.

“School has always been the biggest trigger for my anxiety because I’m afraid of not doing well enough, and I never cut myself any slack. I also have other mental illness issues, and my preoccupation with marks expanded into believing my parents won’t love me if I don’t get the grades I think I should. The pressure comes entirely from within. They have always said as long as I try they will be proud, but I stress myself out anyway.”

(Goram Doctor, Reddit )

You become way too competitive.

“Even my best friends in school were also my fiercest competitors. You had to put school completely aside if you wanted to hang out, because you’d end up hating each other otherwise.”

( indifferentwindmill, Reddit )

Your parents constantly raise the bar.

“My brother and sister were praised for mediocrity, getting extra allowance or other such gifts when they got Bs and Cs. If I brought back anything but top grades I didn’t get such treatment. I always thought it was stupid and unfair.”

(shh_Im_a_Moose, Reddit )

In fact, everyone expects you to be perfect.

“I’ve had a genius-level IQ my whole life, and it’s caused my parents (mother in particular) to believe that I should be able to go whole semesters without ever getting a single exam question wrong. Every time I try to explain that that isn’t how intelligence works, I get told ‘that’s just an excuse, you’re smart.’ Genius does not equal perfection.”

( JBtheBadguy, Reddit )

You’re always trying to get everyone’s approval.

“I think the worst is the constant need for other people’s approval, and basing my entire self-worth on what others think. It’s led to tons of anxiety, because I can never fail at anything, or let other people down. It’s led to a bunch of self-destructive behaviors, where I’ll do things that I hate or that harm myself, just to please other people and gain their approval.”

( BCSteve, Reddit )

You become terrified of failure.

“The ease at which I excelled when I was younger made it hard when I DID struggle, as I was terrified of disappointing everyone. I still suffer from severe anxiety because, frankly, I never learned to fail. And I think that’s an important lesson for people to learn.”

( Cheezit624, Reddit )

Other people hate you for being smart.

“I was always an overachiever, despite being told I was extra smarties, until I got to high school and I suddenly started caring what everyone else thought. In elementary school I got perfect grades. In high school, I stopped trying so damn hard, because everyone hated the kid with the perfect grades. I remember taking a bio test once, I think that was the swing point, where the closest grade to mine was a 78%, and I got a 96%, and everyone hated me.”

(Justice_Man, Reddit )

And jealousy leads to bullying.

“Precocious + bullied, that was probably the formula that made people think I needed the label, really. Adults, rather than dealing with said bullies, just reassured me I was special and that they’d be ‘bagging your groceries’ etc. Ironically I only stopped waiting tables and working in supermarkets about two years ago.”

( TM3Sb, Reddit )

It’s hard to stay positive.

“I found the hardest part of the expectations was staying positive. Top of the line grades were expected. If you got the best grades, you were doing what you were supposed to do. If you got less than stellar grades, you obviously just weren’t applying yourself. It’s hard to be positive when the only reactions are neutral and negative.”

(Griddleman, Reddit )

You constantly feel like you are alone.

“The idea that I was smarter than everybody meant that I only trusted myself, listened to no one and would only except advice when it made sense to me. I mostly used my gifted brain to do as little work as possible and I developed bad habits. I believed that I did not need to do well in school … because I could make up for it later.”

( -sasnak-, Reddit )

You don’t develop a work ethic.

“It would of been nice if they had separated us somehow so school was actually challenging, but once everyone in my life was telling me that I was brilliant rather than just my parents, I never did any work or paid attention in classes. … If I had some work ethic in school I think my life would have turned out loads differently. But as it was, because they knew I was so bright, I never had to do anything.”

( kvellarcanum, Reddit )

And you realize you can’t always fake your work ethic.

“I excelled in grade school without having to put in any effort. I would show up to finals, asking which exam we were taking that day, and get top scores. I never learned how to do homework or maintain any sort of work ethic, but I became very skilled at coasting through courses and bullshitting on essay questions (writing what I speculated the teacher wanted to hear, and not something with actual substance). Once I hit university I couldn’t get away with not doing any work anymore, so I hit a wall that I’m still trying to overcome.”

(Gifos, Reddit )

You develop a false sense of security.

“I was always put in ‘gifted’ programs up until grade six. While I learned a lot in those sessions that I would not have had the privilege to otherwise learn, I feel now it lulled me into a false sense of security of my perceived capabilities, and began to coast in school. It eventually caught up to me, and I still kick myself over letting myself get complacent.”

( Coastty, Reddit )

Weakness become uncomfortably apparent.

“It put a lot of expectations on myself and made the things I was (and still am) weak at a huge deal. For example, I can’t spell or punctuate correctly even now.”

( ByronicHero56, Reddit )

Ultimately, you set unreasonably high standards for yourself.

“I often feel like a huge failure and I can’t look at my transcript without crying. I still consider myself extremely intelligent and capable but I can’t push myself to do the work required to make straight A’s. Overall it’s forced me to set an unreasonably high standard for myself. I have considered myself in a three-year slump (I’m a junior in high school now), but I’m starting to accept that I’m just a B student.”

( Blooopimafish, Reddit )

Yes, those were a solid 19 points highlighting the curses of being labelled Gifted, with a short introductory headline to introduce each comment. 

19 seemingly random comments cherry picked and taken out of context off a currently popular Reddit thread, out of the possible 7000+ and counting, flipped into a nice little Business Insider slideshow, with 150,000+ hits (real hits?) and counting. Good job Business Insider Slideshow, for highlighting a problem and providing a solution to those problems— Oh wait, all you did was further compound the stigma that Giftedness should only be discussed in deprecating or depressing terms, by highlighting the terrible 19.

Still yes, a solid 19 points. While the topic question is heavily weighted on the consequence of being labelled Gifted in school, and not necessarily being an Intellectually gifted individual who shares characteristics with other intellectually gifted individuals, these are only 19 issues facing gifted individuals, labelled gifted or otherwise.

Because Giftedness is a Double Edged Sword, just know that there are definitely 19 Reasons It’s Amazing To Grow Up Gifted. I don’t know if it’s socially acceptable to talk about those reasons, but you’re definitely allowed to live out 20 Reasons It’s Amazing To Grow Up Gifted.

The Misunderstood Face of Giftedness

No, sorry “A Gifted Man” on ABC, you were not the face of Giftedness. But you did make for a good avatar that we used to use, for our branding/vandalism purposes.

The Misunderstood Face Of Giftedness

 

In K-12 classrooms everywhere are children at risk for being misunderstood, medically mislabeled, and educationally misplaced. Not limited to one gender, race, ethnicity or socioeconomic group, they could be the children of your neighbors, your friends, your siblings, and even yourself.

These at-risk children are gifted children.

Contrary to common stereotypes, giftedness is not synonymous with high academic achievement. The gifted student archetype, while expected to be a mature classroom leader, does not fit all gifted students. Some are the class clowns, the lonely awkward child in the back row, the troublemaker. Special needs classrooms are where a number of gifted children end up — their giftedness left unsupported.

Wasting much of their day in unsuitable classrooms, gifted kids may behave in unacceptable ways. Despite giftedness being akin to a special need, funding for it is scarce and the needs of gifted minority and poor are repeatedly and shamefully overlooked. Visual-spatial learners whose learning methods conflict with typical classrooms are also misunderstood. While classrooms need to be academically challenging, for many that also requires sensitivity to cultural, racial and linguistic diversity. Learning strengths, too. Such solutions are not always generally available.

Dr. William H. Smith, former dean of the Karl Menninger School of Psychiatry and Mental Health Sciences, stated, “Giftedness can be confused with some psychiatric disorders, obscure other disorders, and it often needs to be included in treatment planning.”

But many gifted children are never identified. Gifted identification is mandated in only 32 states, and funded in fewer. Most teachers receive only minimal instruction on the identification and management of gifted children. The term gifted tends to evoke elitism, and serious attention is rarely paid to gifted children who are other than high achieving.

A prevalent belief persists that one cannot both be gifted yet struggling in school. Many parents also discount giftedness when their children’s abilities are uneven or counteracted by other difficulties. Yet some gifted children who have unrecognized learning disorders may initially excel in school, until they hit a limit where their compensatory skills unravel.

The 2010 American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Mental Health reported that nearly 37 percent of children and adolescents either met the DSM criteria for a mental health diagnosis or showed some impairment in functioningADHD is seen in nearly 1 in 10 children. Autism spectrum disorders are seen in 1 in 50 children.

This is a global crisis. Pediatric primary care physicians diagnose psychiatric conditions and prescribe psychotropic medicine, but rarely feel adequately prepared by their training to do so.

Highly gifted children are a particular diagnostic challenge. They seem to be wired differently and have developmental trajectories that differ from the norm. Many gifted kids experience the world with heightened and vivid intensities and sensitivities that may be a big plus (allowing them to become creative artists, scientists, inventors, and humanitarians) but also can be a big minus (subjecting them to sometimes overwhelming emotions and worrisome and unacceptable behaviors).

When pediatric diagnoses are carelessly applied, gifted children are frequently mislabeled with ADHD, autistic, depressive, or bipolar disorders.[1]

Dr. Jack Wiggins, former president of the American Psychological Association, stated, “This is a widespread and serious problem — the wasting of lives from the misdiagnosis of gifted children and adults and the inappropriate treatment that often follows.”

Yet sometimes being gifted effectively hides learning and mental health conditions. Giftedness may over-compensate for weaknesses, masking the weakness and sometimes the giftedness. Despite the seriousness of misdiagnosis, physicians are exposed to an alarmingly few articles in the pediatric medical literature about the complexities of giftedness, while many parents also hesitate in discussing giftedness with their doctors, some with the belief that giftedness plays no role in medical health.

Dr. James T. Webb, clinical psychologist, author, and founder of SENG (Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted), stated, “Unfortunately, extremely few psychologists, psychiatrists, pediatricians, or other health care professionals receive any training about characteristics of gifted children and adults, particularly behaviors of bright, creative persons that can sometimes resemble or conceal disorders.”

So, while some gifted kids are erroneously labeled and medicated for mental health disorders they do not have, others are unrecognized for learning or mental disorders they do have.

Normal giftedness can be easily confused with a diagnosable mental disorder. Gifted kids may talk a lot, have high levels of energy, and be impulsive or inattentive or distractible in some settings — similar to symptoms of ADHD. It’s not unusual for gifted kids to struggle socially, have meltdowns over minor issues, or have unusual all-consuming interests — all pointing to an inappropriate diagnosis of autism.

What results is that the gifted frequently feel alone and alien in a world that doesn’t fully understand them.

Dr. Daniel B. Peters and Dr. Edward R. Amend, both clinical psychologists, in a chapter ofHandbook for Counselors Serving Students with Gifts and Talents (2011), wrote, “Although there is no doubt that medication has its place in the management of behavioral and psychological disorders … the practice is not appropriate when medication is incorrectly used to suppress the misunderstood behaviors of gifted children.”

Giftedness too is not always seen as a socially positive and valued trait. Many gifted kids are bullied, others underachieve to hide their abilities, and some experience anxiety and depression with increased risk for self-harm.[2] As many as 20 percent may drop out of school.[3] The social and emotional needs of many gifted children are ignored. Many seek homeschool and early college as more suitable alternatives, though some bypass higher education altogether, having become disillusioned with their earlier experiences, or unable to cope if untreated for unrecognized learning or mental health issues.

There is an urgent need for physician training in giftedness and dual diagnoses. They see kids for very brief visits and many are too influenced by drug marketing (as are parents and teachers). Over-diagnosis and over-treatment are commonplace.

The typical 15-minute exam is not sufficient to accurately distinguish disorders. A gifted child presenting with distractibility or inattentiveness may or may not have ADHD. A seemingly bright child who just gets by in school may be severely struggling with an unrecognized learning disorder hidden by gifted over-compensation. Gifted children may also hide depression and suicidal thoughts.

It is crucial to properly distinguish pathology while accurately addressing concerns. Sometimes the best remedy is simply proper educational placement. Thus, when medical diagnoses are made too quickly, the required conversation abruptly ceases and opportunities to make a positive difference are lost.

The book Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults (2005) offers helpful advice in distinguishing if a gifted child also has other issues needing further evaluation:

• Does the developmental history indicate early milestones or precocious development?


• Are the behavior patterns typical ones for gifted children and adults?

• Are the problem behaviors found only in certain situations or contexts, rather than across most situations?

• Are the problematic behaviors reduced when the person is with other gifted persons or in intellectually supportive settings?

• Can the problematic behaviors be most easily explained as stemming from a gifted/creative person being in an inappropriate situation?

• Are the behaviors ones that really cause an impairment in personal or social functioning, or are they quirks or idiosyncrasies that cause little impairment or discomfort?

Finally, the concept of normal must not be defined by a narrow and arbitrary set of criteria. Not everyone processes information and sensory inputs in the same way, nor does everyone develop along the same expected timeline to the same endpoint. Variability does not automatically indicate a disorder.

Dr. Allen Frances, psychiatrist, author, and chair of the DSM-IV, states: “One of the disasters of the diagnostic inflation is that expectable and desirable individual difference is so often mislabeled as mental disorder. Caution is particularly necessary in diagnosing kids. They are so developmentally labile and have such a short track record that diagnostic mistakes are frequently made and once made are extremely difficult to undo.”

Together let’s proceed with extreme caution. Our children depend upon it.


References:

[1] Webb, James T., et. al. Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults: ADHD, Bipolar, Ocd, Asperger’s, Depression, and Other Disorders. Scottsdale, Ariz.: Great Potential Press. 2005.

[2] Grobman, J. “Underachievement in Exceptionally Gifted Adolescents and Young Adults: A Psychiatrist’s View.” Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 2006 17(4) 199-210.

[3] J Renzulli, S. Park. “Gifted Dropouts: The Who and the Why.” Gifted Child Quarterly. Fall 2000 44: 261-271.

Yup, that sheet looks familiar.

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

| Check

browniehusband:

I feel like the Gifted column describes a lot of my tumblr people, so I wanted to share.

If Only I Had Known: Lessons from Gifted Adults

If you don’t know, NOW YOU KNOW. GIFTED.

Every week since the publication of my first book, The Gifted Adult (previously Liberating Everyday Genius), I have received phone calls, letters, and emails from gifted people around the world and have been fascinated by the similarity of their impassioned comments. Whether from New York City, rural Arizona, Costa Rica, or France, each of them has voiced astonished relief: “For the first time I feel like somebody gets it.” “At last I can see myself clearly!” “Finally I have figured out what has always been wrong with me, and it’s not wrong at all!” “If only I had known!”

No matter what their background, they confess to having felt misunderstood for years; to being bored, held back, and plagued by self-doubt; and to struggling with loneliness. Yet once they had a legitimate explanation of their difference, they quickly began a life review process. Armed with new information about their abilities, they set off on a journey of rediscovery to unearth self-truths that had been lost. They soon realized that their distorted self-concepts were largely the result of uninvited commentary about their difference. Their identity confusion is not surprising, given their lack of useful information about giftedness and given that as they grew up they were defined by others’ views of them more than by their views of themselves.

The first two years of school I colored pictures; then I became a student teacher.

Identity formation occurs gradually and becomes a central task during adolescence. Teens are on a mission to figure out who they are, what they stand for, and where they are going. A formidable task for everyone, it is an even greater challenge for the gifted. This wouldn’t be so if giftedness were better understood by teachers, parents, and peers. The characteristics of the gifted that are the underpinnings of excellence (e.g., extrasensitivity, intensity, complexity, and above-average energy and drive) are the same ones so often criticized by others as excessive or annoying.

Gifted people often grow up with a pervasive sense of being considered an extremist—having too much of just about every personal trait to fit everyone else’s definition of acceptable. The criticisms they face often are leveled not at their performance but at their personhood. A performance complaint sounds like this: “That essay is not acceptable, because it does not address the topic I assigned.” A personhood attack sounds like this: “Once again I see that you decided to make up your own assignment. Why do you think you always deserve special treatment?” The first statement implies the student has done something unacceptable; the second, that he or she is unacceptable. Paradoxically, such criticisms are often mixed with praise like “You’re so smart; you can do anything!” It’s no wonder that gifted people, faced with conflicting information, find it nearly impossible to develop an accurate self-view.

How can we help the gifted value their difference and deal with the criticism? This is what I asked my gifted clients and readers. As adults who had gained a life-changing understanding of what it meant to be gifted, they were able to impart practical lessons for those of us who teach, parent, and guide gifted youth today:

  • Stay on track with important goals. Conceptualize and operationalize them from start to finish. Identify clearly what you want to achieve and then find people who can help you develop a step-by-step plan, who have gone where you want to go, and who can share with you what they have learned.
  • Become a skilled negotiator. Find a counselor who can help you learn to do more than complain about or put up with the status quo. When you want to change something but are not the decision maker, come to the table with three things: a respectful attitude; a brief, positively stated reason for the change that sounds like a win-win solution; and a specific suggestion that others will find doable.
  • Don’t let your strong reactions to unfairness lead you astray. Before you go off on a mission to correct some injustice, ask yourself, “Is this something I am willing to go to the wall for? Is this the right time? If so, what will be the probable versus the preferred result?”
  • Get the mundane tasks out of the way without getting sidetracked by how much they annoy you. Save your energy for your greatest passion.
  • No matter how many talents or interests you have, do not allow yourself to become scattered. Develop a self-care plan and practice a technique like meditation, yoga, guided imagery, or deep breathing to center yourself each day. This will help you spread your energy around and lessen the risk of coming apart at the seams.
  • Look for and take advantage of opportunity and luck, but don’t expect them to come to you. Do expect setbacks and make room for them in your plans. Be prepared to have your dreams ridiculed and your hopes dashed from time to time—it’s what happens to creative producers. Tell yourself again and again that few things come about by chance. When you are knocked to the ground, get back up, dust yourself off, and keep going. Don’t let anyone tell you that the fulfillment of high potential works any other way.

Of course, even when gifted people fully understand their difference, they may discover that the world is not the haven for creative development that they had hoped for. But no matter how rocky the road, my gifted adult clients surely agree that it is their giftedness that has carried them. Giftedness holds fast to optimism and dreams in the face of adversity. And the dreams and ideas of self-starting visionaries are nearly impossible to suppress.

Moreover, once the gifted know who they are and who they are not, they gain strength, confidence, and resilience. From then on it’s a matter of building skills—of getting smart about being smart. Once equipped, they find that the world in which they must make their way is far more manageable.

—Mary-Elaine Jacobsen, PsyD

MythBusters: Gifted Kids, Students, Classes, Programs, Problems

Ten Myths About Gifted Students And Programs For Gifted

By Carolyn Coil, Special to CNN

(CNN) – American educators have struggled for more than 40 years to define giftedness. Yet even now, there is no universally agreed upon definition of what it means to be gifted. U.S. federal law defines gifted students as those who perform or who show promise of performing at high levels in any one of five categories: general intellectual ability, specific academic aptitude, creative or productive thinking, leadership ability or visual/performing arts.

Beyond that definition, there are no specific national criteria for identifying gifted and talented students nor does federal law provide funding or mandates for identification of these students or programming for them. This definition is left to the states.

The result has been a wide variety of state definitions and methods for the identification of gifted children. Some states have specific definitions for giftedness, while others have none. Some states require programs for gifted students, while others do not.

In other words, the availability of programs and services for gifted students depends for the most part on where a student lives and what state, school district or school he or she is in.

There is debate over how to identify and measure giftedness, whether giftedness is innate (nature) or developed (nurture) and whether giftedness is driven by intelligence test results or through other indicators.

These varying perspectives have led to much misinformation about gifted students and what programs for gifted students should look like. Here are 10 of the most common myths about gifted students and programs for the gifted:

Myth No. 1: Intelligence is inherited and does not change. Gifted students, therefore, do not need any special services.

All of us do inherit certain traits, intelligences and talents. But these need to be developed and nurtured throughout life for them to grow and reach their full potential. A beautiful flower inherits certain traits. But if it is not watered and fed and if it does not get the right amount of sunlight, it does not develop as it could. The same is true for gifted children.

Myth No. 2: Giftedness can easily be measured by intelligence tests and tests of achievement.

Giftedness is difficult to measure. This is why schools and school districts try so many different ways to identify gifted students. Tests are often culturally biased and may reflect ethnicity, socioeconomic status, exposure and experiences rather than true giftedness. Other children may be gifted but are not good at taking tests. They may not score well on standardized tests but may be gifted, especially in creative and productive thinking.

Myth No. 3: There is no need to identify gifted students in the early grades.

Many school districts do not begin identifying gifted and talented students until third grade. There is a belief among some educators that giftedness cannot be properly identified in the early grades. However, the National Association for Gifted Children programming standards start with pre-kindergarten. The group’s early childhood network position paper says that “providing engaging, responsive learning environments … benefit all children, including young gifted children.”

Myth No. 4: Gifted students read all the time, wear glasses and/or are physically and socially inept.

From Jason, the cartoon character in the “Foxtrot” comic strip, to Sheldon on the TV show “The Big Bang Theory,” we can see this stereotype in action. But like all other kids, gifted children come in many varieties. Some are successful in sports or music, and some are physically attractive. Some have many friends, while others have only a few. Some are extreme extroverts, while others are introverts. There is no one type of person or personality we can pinpoint as gifted.

Myth No. 5: Gifted kids are all model students – they’re well-behaved and make good grades.

This statement reflects another stereotype about gifted students. Some gifted children are model students. They are compliant, follow directions, never misbehave and make straight A’s. But many others challenge teachers, do their own thing instead of the assigned work, procrastinate until the last minute when doing long-range assignments, get low grades, are disorganized and have poor study skills.

Myth No. 6: All gifted students work up to their potential.

Most schools have their share of gifted underachievers. These students have the potential for excellence but - for a variety of reasons - do not fulfill that potential. Gifted underachievers may decide they will only do the minimum requirements and choose the easy work instead of more challenging tasks. They often lack study and organizational skills because in the early grades they don’t need to develop them. Some get discouraged when the work doesn’t come easily, and others don’t want to look gifted because it isn’t “cool.”

Myth No. 7: Teaching gifted students is easy.

Some believe that a good teacher can easily teach any student. If this were the case, good teaching with no special training would be all that is needed to teach gifted students. However, in my many years of teaching graduate-level courses in gifted education, I have found that good teachers add to their skills and learn new strategies and techniques targeted particularly to meeting the needs of the gifted. Most teachers of the gifted tell me this is the hardest, most challenging, most exhausting and most rewarding teaching they have ever done.

Myth No. 8: Gifted students will get by on their own without any special help from the school.

I hear this myth often, especially in times of budget cutting. Some people claim that gifted students come from wealthy families who can meet their children’s needs. Others assert that the expense of providing gifted programs cannot be justified. In general, the assumption is that gifted students will succeed regardless of the quality of the education they receive. This is simply not true. Gifted students require special services and programs to ensure the growth rather than the loss of their outstanding abilities.

Myth No. 9: It never hurts gifted students to teach others what they already know.

If gifted students already know the grade-level standards, it may seem logical to have them teach others. This is faulty logic. It assumes that teaching struggling students is something gifted kids innately know how to do. Most gifted students do not know how to tutor others. They often are frustrated that struggling students don’t understand what they perceive as easy. Peer tutoring using gifted students also takes away time they should be using for more advanced work, more rigor and more higher-level thinking.

Myth No. 10: All children are gifted.

If all kids are gifted, then there is no need to identify gifted students and no need for any special programs for gifted. I strongly believe that all children have distinctive and unique qualities that make each one valuable. This does not mean, however, that all children are gifted. Being identified as gifted simply means that certain children have needs that are different from most others at their age and grade level. All gifted students need programs and services to ensure their growth rather than the loss of their outstanding abilities.

The Big Five Overexcitabilities — SanSerafin: Many parents of gifted children and others are now aware of Dabrowski’s theory of overexcitabilities...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Many parents of gifted children and others are now aware of Dabrowski’s theory of overexcitabilities (often shortened to OEs). According to Dabrowski, people with a high potential for personal development will have at least some of these five areas of overexcitability (Piechowski, 2006):

  • Intellectual OE. Not the same as intelligence or academic ability, intellectual overexcitability is a passion for and drive toward learning, problem-solving, and reflective thinking. As an adult, you may misunderstand intellectual OE simply as having been good at school or being smart, unaware of how much it drives you on a daily basis. Or you may mistakenly think that if you weren’t good at school (i.e., you didn’t get good grades), you can’t have intellectual OE.
  • Emotional OE. More than just strong feelings, emotional overexcitability is a great capacity for emotional attachments, mind-body connections, and complexity of feelings, both positive and negative. Perhaps you have been told you are too emotional. You may feel that you wear your feelings not only on your sleeves, but all over your body like a tattoo. Or maybe have you learned to hide your strong emotions deep inside, so that others think you are cool or even distant, while inside you feel everything, all the time.
  • Imaginational OE. People with imaginational overexcitability experience unusual imaginative and fantastical thought, play out emotional tension through imagery, and have little tolerance for boredom. You may be shy, self-conscious, or have a tendency toward depression. You worry about issues of life and death more than other people. Or you seem to absorb the emotions of people around you and may have trouble setting personal boundaries and separating your own feelings and needs from those of others.
  • Psychomotor OE. Distinct from athleticism or physical talent, psychomotor overexcitabiltiy is what Michael Piechowski (2006) calls personal energy, and it is experienced as surplus energy, or physical manifestations of emotional energy. Your psychomotor intensity might be expressed more strongly when your emotions run high, such as pacing the room when you are stressed or needing more physical release of energy when you are worried about an illness in the family, or are intensely involved in learning something new.
  • Sensual OE. Sensual overexcitability shows itself in heightened sensitivity to sounds, smells, tastes, tactile experiences, and beauty, leading both to aesthetic pleasure and to sensory discomfort. People with this OE have a heightened reaction to the sensual side of life, which, as with emotional intensity, may lead to being criticized for being too sensitive to your environment.

Actually, more like, GIFTED 4 LIFE AmIRite? — "You don't need this junk. You need a cat.": "Gifted" is a lie and its programs are worse.

youneedacat:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[This is a response to josiahd’s I don’t like the concept of “gifted”. It took on a life of its own so it gets its own post. Warning: It’s all concrete personal experience, not an abstract deconstruction of IQ. Because that’s how my brain works.]

I hate it. In gifted programs I saw kids being indoctrinated into arrogance, elitism, etc. I think that’s how they get ideas like “I don’t even know how to talk to someone with a normal IQ, let alone a low one.” They’re often the same ones who refuse to believe my IQ went down to 85, and would probably be even lower now. Because talking to me online, or knowing I was once in gifted programs at school, they think they can predict my IQ.

In fact I was tested three times in my life and only the first time, probably because of hyperlexia, being white, and a biased tester, did I test in the so called gifted range. I mean reading superficially well at an age when most kids barely just learned their alphabet goes for a lot, especially with a tester who doesn’t believe it’s truly possible to get both high and low subscores. Getting older just exposed my weaknesses, my losses, and my failure to shoot forward in a typically developing way, so my IQ shot downward. It’s like having a big head start in a couple areas of a race of academic skills when first grade started, but then walking slowly, turning around backward, and wandering off the track entirely. I know a lot of autistic people of my general subtype this happened to.

And what happened to me as a result of this classification of gifted when I began falling behind is awful, even if it postponed my classification as broken for a couple years (but amplified that classification when I crashed and burned for good). But I’ve gone into that other places and lack cognitive spoons to describe it again right now. Being presumed bored when falling behind leads to pressure that can kill you. Everyone presumes this false idea of giftedness is permanent. And it’s horribly biased on the basis of race, class, and disability. There’s a terrible underside to this classification that affects both those classified and those not.

I went to a college when I was 14 that was not only for gifted students but just anyone who went to college at high school age. It had college classes mixed with some high school curriculum. I hung on by my fingernails but not very well at times, very much doing the faking of comprehension. Which only helped sometimes. The next few year, I was only in institution schools and special ed. When I was in school at all.

This gives me a fairly unique opportunity to observe things that most people flat out wouldn’t believe. They wouldn’t believe it because they tell themselves stories about what gifted and special ed mean. Those stories make them interpret identical behavior in extremely different ways. Then they don’t remember the behavior, just their interpretation and the stories in their heads. This is maddening to me because they just cause so much destruction that way.

So what I saw was that in both places you saw identical behavior. Lying on the floor. Eating inedible substances. Stimming. Playing with objects in highly abnormal ways. Motor and vocal tics. Etc. But in gifted settings that stuff is considered endearingly quirky and a sign of an advanced mind. In special ed it’s because you’re too stupid or crazy not to.

It made me so angry when I needed to lie down on the floor during a visit to MIT. I was terrified to and my hosts were bewildered and told me everyone did things like that there. Mind you I was terrified to be at a place like that at all because during my last attempt at university I was told people like me don’t belong on university campuses. But the lying down. I’d been through years of humiliation, behavior programs, and being pathologized for lying on floors until I was deeply ashamed and afraid to do it when necessary. And here was this place for gifted people telling me I could do it and talking about their endearingly quirky students. I’d just come there directly after a developmental disability conference and was acutely aware most people like us are forbidden in such places. And it really fucked with my head. I couldn’t handle it.

Mind you I think it’s right for people to be allowed to lie down on floors. That wasn’t my problem. It was the contrast. It was things I can’t even name that make me want to cry. It was horrible. I felt so acutely uncomfortable on the MIT campus. The same way I do in the kind of neighborhoods most likely to call the cops on me for being outside alone. I felt like everyone would discover who I really was, under their admiration for me. I felt like a traitor to other people like me. It’s so hard to explain.

That was when I discovered I am more comfortable at self-advocacy conferences, full of people who live roughly the way I do, usually as clients of the same system, than I am in any other place full of tons of people. I don’t ever have that experience of coming home to any community, but there at least I feel I don’t stand out or feel weird and out of place or like I have to prove my right to be there. And around here at least it’s a real community. One that gets things done that help real people, and helps its members, and sees its members as people, and doesn’t require us all to have the same opinions or believe in an ideology. Which is more than I can say for a lot of things that call themselves communities. It’s far from perfect but it’s better than anything else I’ve seen.

So when I went from there to MIT I was in culture shock. I mean I spent only maybe a total of six years (and I may be counting some things as years that were shorter) in academic gifted programs, but I’ve been in disability programs, either DD or mixed psych/DD or physical/DD, for about 18 years now. And my parting with attempts at college and university was far from on good terms. So visiting MIT felt intimidating as hell and like… just wrong all over. It’s indescribable.

And the place felt wrong too in a way that wasn’t connected to me. Because I know that only certain types of people can go there as real students. I wouldn’t be among them. Even though I could very well contribute to their projects in ways that they couldn’t. There are huge amounts of people who could contribute but aren’t allowed there. I did my best to see if they would let more people do what I did. But that’s not enough. It bothered me that they had this exclusive place where weird behavior is tolerated and encouraged and considered endearing and part of the culture because they are gifted enough to earn that right when millions of disabled people around the world will never be able to earn that right in that manner. I don’t mind that there are places that allow it. I mind that it has to be earned through presumed intellectual capacity.

That’s why I was so angry when they let me lie down. I’d just come from a place full of people who are very much my people, who would have been punished and may still be, for doing things like that. I knew this was a privilege they think they earn. I knew I was being falsely invited into the group of people who have earned it through what they believe intelligence to be. I knew they meant well and had no clue the significance of their actions towards me or other disabled people they were not even imagining. Especially DD people, who are usually presumed not smart enough for the privilege. And it just felt so very wrong in ways that can’t be described. This isn’t how the world should work.

So much of “gifted” and associated concepts involves picking out a group of special people who then get things everyone should have. And it has an undertone of a really toxic competitive outlook. I just get to see it from both sides because I’ve appeared to both professionals and laypeople as both gifted and an empty shell. That gives me a perspective most people will never have.

Classic Giftedness!

i-aimto-misbehave submitted to fyeahroleplayingrabbit:

I’m gifted, and I love to write. People say I’m very mature for my age. I’ve always been the youngest in almost any social situation, and I can’t get along with people my age.

I started RPing in an OC Star Wars community when I was 12. It wasn’t really an issue that I was the youngest of all the Jedi and Sith, and honestly, I don’t think any of them even knew. But when I brought it up, they started acting weird.

I began Omegle RPing when I was 13, and again, no one knows you so it’s not an issue. In fact, I felt like I couldn’t really tell people my age because I knew I would get judged for it. I saw a lot of posts on tumblr, facebook, etc that stereotyped any RPer under the age of sixteen to be uneducated and juvenile, OOC and bad with characters and talkinn lyke d1s!1! They were always really hurtful, but I didn’t bring it up because whenever I did, people would be really surprised and start treating me differently, even though I’m the same person I was when they thought I was seventeen. 

Now I’m 14 and I’m in a few communities. There’s only one person I know in this community who’s younger than me, and I still see a lot of posts on tumblr stereotyping young RPers and acting like roleplay is only for people who are sixteen and older. I’ve been writing most of my life, and it’s really hurtful and it feels like discrimination when people won’t RP with me because they presume I’m bad at it.

So people:

Don’t judge people from their age, or from anything besides their actual ability to RP.

~kyokisaz.tumblr.com~

:) — The Anonymous Hippie: Gifted frustrations

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

theanonymoushippie:

I am so frustrated. Any time that giftedness has been brought up in the unschooling community (the people I know) people either go “Well, every child is gifted” or “That’s a school thing”. God no why. I think I know exactly one family that recognizes giftedness as real. It just makes me want to hide in a cave for the rest of my life because even the group that’s supposed to be all accepting and believing of peoples identities doesn’t believe giftedness is real. And I know what’s going to happen, people are going to Google “what is giftedness” and read a little and they’re going to be like “Oh so it means they’re creative, they like to learning and they act as themselves? That’s every unschooling family/person/child!”. Again, god no why. I’m just mad right now because there is no way to explain to people that are not gifted what giftedness is without them being offended. And there is no way to explain it without me feeling really sensitive and without it making me question my experiences as a person. Then again there is really not much that you can discuss without me feeling sensitive and all question-y about me experiences.

Yes, I realize this post if full of sweeping generalizations. But so help me, I’m feeling sad and angry and this is what Tumblr is for right?

Trying to hold back gifted tears now.

- Olivia, me, a gifted fifteen year old.

Ah yes, Giftedness and ODD — The World is much too interesting to play it cool: Gifted vs Being an Asshole

laraswanland:

  • CW: Our company has a hard time with people who are gifted.
  • LS: Is that just a nice way of telling me that I’m an asshole?
  • CW: Of course not.
  • LS: Doesn’t follow direction, questions authority, proceeds with single minded determinism…
  • CW: Perhaps that could be an ass hole too.
  • LS: Gifted Ass hole.
  • CW: In the context of the organization.
  • LS: Used in a sentence would read, “In our organization, we have been gifted with an asshole.”
  • CW: I think you are missing the point of the word here…


Ah yes, Giftedness & Oppositional Defiant Disorder!

Doesn’t follow the flock? Check. Questions authrority & motive? Check. Beats to his own drum? Check! (For the record, I know I’m an asshole, not a douchebag, and there is a big difference in that.)


Mis-Diagnosis and Dual Diagnosis of Gifted Children:
Gifted and LD, ADHD, OCD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder

By James T. Webb, Ph.D.

Many gifted and talented children (and adults) are being mis-diagnosed by psychologists, psychiatrists, pediatricians, and other health care professionals.

The most common mis-diagnoses are: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional Defiant Disorder (OD), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and Mood Disorders such as Cyclothymic Disorder, Dysthyinic Disorder, Depression, and Bi-Polar Disorder.

These common mis-diagnoses stem from an ignorance among professionals about specific social and emotional characteristics of gifted children which are then mistakenly assumed by these professionals to be signs of pathology.

In some situations where gifted children have received a correct diagnosis, giftedness is still a factor that must be considered in treatment, and should really generate a dual diagnosis.

For example, existential depression or learning disability, when present in gifted children or adults, requires a different approach because new dimensions are added by the giftedness component.

Yet the giftedness component typically is overlooked due to the lack of training and understanding by health care professionals (Webb & Kleme, 1993).

Despite prevalent myths to the contrary, gifted children and adults are at particular psychological risk due to both internal characteristics and situational factors.

These internal and situational factors can lead to interpersonal and psychological difficulties for gifted children, and subsequently to mis-diagnoses and inadequate treatment.

Internal Factors

First, let me mention the internal aspects (Webb, 1993). Historically, nearly all of the research on gifted individuals has focused on the intellectual aspects, particularly in an academic sense. Until recently, little attention has been given to personality factors which accompany high intellect and creativity.

Even less attention has been given to the observation that these personality factors intensify and have greater life effects when intelligence level increases beyond JQ 130 (Silverman, 1993; Webb, 1993; Winner, 2000).

Perhaps the most universal, yet most often overlooked, characteristic of gifted children and adults is their intensity (Silverman, 1993; Webb, 1993). One mother described it succinctly when she said, “My child’s life motto is that anything worth doing is worth doing to excess.”

Gifted children — and gifted adults— often are extremely intense, whether in their emotional response, intellectual pursuits, sibling rivalry, or power struggles with an authority figure.

Mis-Diagnosis of Gifted Children

Impatience is also frequently present, both with oneself and with others. The intensity also often manifests itself in heightened motor activity and physical restlessness.

Along with intensity, one typically finds in gifted individuals an extreme sensitivity to emotions, sounds, touch, taste, etc. These children may burst into tears while watching a sad event on the evening news, keenly hear fluorescent lights, react strongly to smells, insist on having the tags removed from their shirts, must touch everything, or are overly reactive to touch in a tactile-defensive manner.

The gifted individual’s drive to understand, to question, and to search for consistency is likewise intense, as is the inherent ability to see possibilities and alternatives.

All of these characteristics together result in an intense idealism and concern with social and moral issues, which can create anxiety, depression, and a sharp challenging of others who do not share their concerns.

Situational Factors

Situational factors are highly relevant to the problem of mis-diagnosis (Webb, 1993). Intensity, sensitivity, idealism, impatience, questioning the status quo—none of these alone necessarily constitutes a problem.

In fact, we generally value these characteristics and behaviors—unless they happen 10 occur in a tightly structured classroom, or in a highly organized business setting, or if they happen to challenge some cherished tradition, and gifted children are the very ones who challenge traditions or the status quo.

There is a substantial amount of research to indicate that gifted children spend at least one-fourth to one-half of the regular classroom time waiting for others to catch up. Boredom is rampant because of the age tracking in our public schools.

Peer relations for gifted children are often difficult (Webb, Meckstroth and Tolan, 1982; Winner, 2000), all the more so because of the internal dyssynchrony (asynchronous development) shown by so many gifted children where their development is uneven across various academic, social, and developmental areas, and where their judgment often lags behind their intellect.

Clearly, there are possible (or even likely) problems that are associated with the characteristic strengths of gifted children.

Lack of understanding by parents, educators, and health professionals, combined with the problem situations (e.g., lack of appropriately differentiated education) leads to interpersonal problems which are then mis-labeled, and thus prompt the mis-diagnoses. The most common mis-diagnoses are as follows.

Common Mis-Diagnoses

ADHD and Gifted. Many gifted children are being mis-diagnosed as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The gifted child’s characteristics of intensity, sensitivity, impatience, and high motor activity can easily be mistaken for ADHD.

Some gifted children surely do suffer from ADHD, and thus have a dual diagnosis of gifted and ADHD; but in my opinion, most are not. Few health care professionals give sufficient attention to the words about ADHD in DSM-IV( 1994) that say “…inconsistent with developmental level….”

The gifted child’s developmental level is different (asynchronous) when compared to other children, and health care professionals need to ask whether the child’s inattentiveness or impulsivity behaviors occur only in some situations but not in others (e.g., at school but not at home; at church, but not at scouts, etc.).

If the problem behaviors are situational only, the child is likely not suffering from ADHD.

To further complicate matters, my own clinical observation suggests that about three percent of highly gifted children suffer from a functional borderline hypoglycemic condition.

Silverman (1993) has suggested that perhaps the same percentage also suffer from allergies of various kinds. Physical reactions in these conditions, when combined with the intensity and sensitivity, result in behaviors that can mimic ADHD.

However, the ADHD-like symptoms in such cases will vary with the time of day, length of time since last meal, type of foods eaten, or exposure to other environmental agents.

Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Gifted. The intensity, sensitivity, and idealism of gifted children often lead others to view them as “strong-willed.”

Power struggles with parents and teachers are common, particularly when these children receive criticism, as they often do, for some of the very characteristics that make them gifted (e.g., why are you so sensitive, always questioning me, trying to do things a different way, etc.).

Bi-Polar and other Mood Disorders and Gifted. Recently, I encountered a parent whose highly gifted child had been diagnosed with Bi-Polar Disorder. This intense child, whose parents were going through a bitter divorce, did indeed show extreme mood swings, but, in my view, the diagnosis of Bi-Polar Disorder was off the mark.

In adolescence, or sometimes earlier, gifted children often do go through periods of depression related to their disappointed idealism, and their feelings of aloneness and alienation culminate in an existential depression. However, it is not at all clear that this kind of depression warrants such a major diagnosis.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Gifted. Even as preschoolers, gifted children love to organize people and things into complex frameworks, and get quite upset when others don’t follow their rules or don’t understand their schema.

Many gifted first graders are seen as perfectionist and “bossy” because they try to organize the other children, and sometimes even try to organize their family or the teacher. As they grow up, they continue to search intensely for the “rules of life” and for consistency.

Their intellectualizing, sense of urgency, perfectionism, idealism, and intolerance for mistakes may be misunderstood to be signs of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder or Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder.

In some sense, however, giftedness is a dual diagnosis with Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder since intellectualization may be assumed to underlie many of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for this disorder.

Dual Diagnoses

Learning Disabilities and Giftedness. Giftedness is a coexisting factor, to be sure, in some diagnoses. One notable example is in diagnosis and treatment of learning disabilities.

Few psychologists are aware that inter-subscale scatter on the Wechsler intelligence tests increases as a child’s overall IQ score exceeds 130. In children with a Full Scale IQ score or greater, it is not uncommon to find a difference of 20 or more points between Verbal IQ Performance IQ (Silverman, 1993; Webb & Kleme, 1993; Winner, 2000).

Most clinical psychologists are taught that such a discrepancy is serious cause for concern regarding possible serious brain dysfunction, including learning disabilities.

For highly gifted children, such discrepancy is far less likely to be an indication of pathological brain dysfunction, though it certainly would suggest an unusual learning style and perhaps a relative learning disability.

Similarly, the difference between the highest and lowest scores on individual subscales within intelligence and achievement tests is often quite notable in gifted children.

On the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -III, it is not uncommon to find subscale differences greater than seven scale score points for gifted children, particularly those who are highly gifted.

These score discrepancies are taken by most psychologists to indicate learning disabilities, and in a functional sense they do represent that.

That is, the levels of ability do vary dramatically, though the range may be “only” from Very Superior to Average level of functioning. In this sense, gifted children may not “qualify” for a diagnosis of learning disability, and indeed some schools seem to have a policy of “only one label allowed per student,” and since this student is gifted, he/she can not also be considered learning disabled.

However, it is important for psychologists to understand the concept of “asynchronous development” (Silverman, 1993), and to appreciate that most gifted children show such an appreciable, and often significant, scatter of abilities.

Poor handwriting is often used as one indicator of learning disabilities. However, many and perhaps most gifted children will show poor handwriting.

Usually this simply represents that their thoughts go so much faster than their hands can move, and that they see little sense in making writing an art form when its primary purpose is to communicate (Webb & Kleme, 1993; Winner, 2000).

Psychologists must understand that, without intervention, self-esteem issues are almost a guarantee in gifted children with learning disabilities as well as those who simply have notable asynchronous development since they tend to evaluate themselves based more on what they cannot do rather than on what they are able to do.

Sharing formal ability and achievement test results with gifted children about their particular abilities, combined with reassurance, can often help them develop a more appropriate sense of self-evaluation.

Sleep Disorders and Giftedness. Nightmare Disorder, Sleep Terror Disorder, and Sleepwalking Disorder appear to be more prevalent among gifted children, particularly boys.

It is unclear whether this should be considered a mis-diagnosis or a dual diagnosis. Certainly, parents commonly report that their gifted children have dreams that are more vivid, intense, and more often in color, and that a substantial proportion of gifted boys are more prone to sleepwalking and bed wetting, apparently related to their dreams and to being more soundly (i.e., intensely) asleep.

Such concordance would suggest that giftedness may need to be considered as a dual diagnosis in these cases, or at least a factor worthy of consideration since the child’s intellect and sense of understanding often can be used to help the child cope with nightmares.

A little known observation concerning sleep in gifted individuals is that about twenty percent of gifted children seem to need significantly less sleep than other children, while another twenty percent appear to need significantly more sleep than other children.

Parents report that these sleep patterns show themselves very early in the child’s life, and long-term follow up suggests that the pattern continues into adulthood (Webb & Kleme, 1993; Winner, 2000). Some highly gifted adults appear to average comfortably as few as two or three hours sleep each night, and they have indicated to me that even in childhood they needed only four or five hours sleep.

Multiple Personality Disorders and Giftedness. Though there is little formal study of giftedness factors within MPD, there is anecdotal evidence that the two are related.

The conclusion of professionals at the Meiminger Foundation was that most MPD patients showed a history of childhood abuse, but also high intellectual abilities which allowed them to create and maintain their elaborate separate personalities (W. H. Smith personal communication, April 18, 1996).

Relational Problems and Giftedness. As one mother told me, “Having a gifted child in the family did not change our family’s lifestyle; it simply destroyed it!”

These children can be both exhilarating and exhausting. But because parents often lack information about characteristics of gifted children, the relationship between parent and child can suffer. The child’s behaviors are seen as mischievous, impertinent, weird, or strong-willed, and the child often is criticized or punished for behaviors that really represent curiosity, intensity, sensitivity, or the lag of judgment behind intellect.

Thus, intense power struggles, arguments, temper tantrums, sibling rivalry, withdrawal, underachievement, and open flaunting of family and societal traditions may occur within the family.

“Impaired communication” and “inadequate discipline” are specifically listed in the DSM4V (1994) as areas of concern to be considered in a diagnosis of Parent-Child Relational Problems, and a diagnosis of Sibling Relational Problem is associated with significant impairment of functioning within the family or in one or more siblings.

Not surprisingly, these are frequent concerns for parents of gifted children due to the intensity, impatience, asynchronous development, and lag of judgment behind intellect of gifted children.

Health care professionals could benefit from increased knowledge concerning the effects of a gifted child’s behaviors within a family, and thus often avoid mistaken notions about the causes of the problems.

The characteristics inherent within gifted children have implications for diagnosis and treatment which could include therapy for the whole family, not in the sense of develop coping mechanisms for dealing with the intensity, sensitivity, and herwise may cause them problems later (Jacobsen, 1999).

Conclusion

Some of our most brightest and most creative minds are not only going unrecognized, but they are being given diagnoses that indicate pathology. For decades, psychologists and others have given great emphasis to the functioning of persons in the lower spectrum.

It is time that we trained health care professionals to give correct assessments to gifted, talented, and creative children and adults. At the very least, we must help professionals gain sufficient understanding so that they no longer misinterpret characteristics of giftedness.

~~~~

Article in M. Neihart, Chair, Cutting Edge Minds—What it Means to be Exceptional Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Washington, D.C. August 7, 2000

Copyright © 2005 Great Potential Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

Published here with kind permission of the author.

This article has now been expanded into a book, Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults

Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted (SENG), a non-profit organization dedicated to gifted children and adults, has partnered with the film production company Our Children’s Future to create a feature-length documentary highlighting the plight of children who are misdiagnosed with disorders such as ADHD or Asperger’s Syndrome - see information page on the SENG site.

Gifted 101: Myths, Facts, and Downright Lies

grayer:

Gifted education is one of the most misunderstood branches of education. As an educator, it is more crucial than ever to have a basic understanding of gifted education. As of 2011, the US government has abolished federal gifted funding. Even if your school has a gifted program, you are the eyes and ears of the classroom. Most teachers have little professional development in gifted education. Many educators erroneously believe certain practices are beneficial for gifted students. Can you answer these questions?

Myth or Fact: Cooperative learning in heterogeneous groups provide academic benefits for gifted and talented students.

Myth or Fact: Every child is gifted.

Continue reading to gauge your understanding with questions and answers…

Myth or Fact: Every child is gifted.

Myth: Every child is unique, special, and deserving of the best education opportunities we can provide. However, based on federal definitions, not every child is gifted. Gifted students typically fall under special education criteria, once again it varies from state to state. Claiming every child is gifted is akin to suggesting every child is a special education student. This negates the best professional practices for each end of the spectrum.


Myth or Fact: He can’t be gifted his grades aren’t good.

Myth: If a cheetah isn’t running at 70mph is it still a cheetah? We run the risk of neglecting unidentified gifted students if we only base our criteria on academic accomplishments. Many gifted students have become disillusioned or have learned to “not go ahead.” Other gifted students tend to “space-out” if they have already mastered a topic, instead choosing to pursue their own interests. Studies also show that gifted students will play dumb to avoid attention, especially low-income minority students. Gifted students do not have synchronous development. For example, a student may be gifted but his/her writing will typically lag behind the other skills. Gifted students have asynchronous development.

Myth or Fact: She has a learning disability, but she is gifted.

Fact: Students who are gifted and have a disability are called Twice Exceptional. While we can acknowledge a student can still be gifted with a physical disability, we have a harder time acknowledging it for others. It is possible for a student to be gifted verbally, but have a learning disability in math. A student may be dyslexic but excel in mathematics. This is true for Autism, ADD/ADHD, and other factors that would make them twice exceptional.

Myth or Fact: There are different levels of giftedness.

Fact: There are generally 5 types of giftedness. A student at Level 1 is usually your typical high achiever, chances a grade level has around 20% of students at Level 1. A Level 1 student is usually fine in the regular classroom but will require more advanced work. As you progress through the levels, different accommodations must be made such as gifted programs, pull-out, acceleration. Your Level 5 is considered a prodigy.

Myth or Fact: He is such a behavior problem he can’t be gifted.

Myth: While we think a gifted student may be the eager teacher’s pet in the front, this is not always the case. A bored gifted student may lash out, refuse to do assignments, and become an expert debater. A large amount of bored gifted students will show signs of ADD/ADHD. Many of our gifted students are misdiagnosed and drugged.

Myth or Fact: I can accommodate all students with differentiation.

Myth: Differentiation is a wonderful tool to accommodate the needs of Level 1 gifted students. However, many teachers are not trained in acceptable differentiation for gifted students. It must contain challenge, higher-order thinking, and contain breadth and depth. A fun art project is not differentiation, more questions is not differentiation, and teaching other students is not differentiation. Gifted students also need instruction. Would you be able to give them instruction in advanced areas or would they be primarily left to independent work while you helped other students?

Myth or Fact: Cooperative learning in heterogeneous groups provide academic benefits for gifted and talented students.

Myth: It seems every teacher wants to pair students high-low so gifted students can serve as a mini-teacher. Stop it! Students should be able to work with different abilities for non-academic tasks (planning a class celebration, working on a fundraiser, completing a school-wide project). Pairing academic high with academic low is not best professional practice. The gifted child has not spent the hours or coursework learning how to teach. No study supports any positive academic outcomes. Gifted students resent it and the low students feel embarrassed. All students report frustration. It is more preferable to group high-high, high-middle, low-low, or low-middle. These groupings show much better outcomes.

Myth or Fact: Acceleration and Special Programs are harmful for social skills.

Myth: There is no evidence that shows acceleration is harmful to a gifted child’s social skills. In fact, the opposite is true. Gifted students report higher self-esteem and having more friends when they are accelerated. The report A Nation Deceived goes into detail how acceleration is one of the best practices, but hardly ever used in schools. This report is a must read. Gifted students also do better when they are clustered. They are able to work at a higher pace with much more breadth and depth of subject matter. Middle and Low students also benefit. The teacher is able to provide more support because she doesn’t have to worry about different levels of differentiation. Middle students benefit because without the highest students they can rise to the top. Gifted students need to spend the majority of the day with other gifted students.

Myth or Fact: A pull-out program is not ideal for gifted students.

Fact: While a pull-out program is better than no program, it still falls short. A gifted student isn’t only gifted on Tuesday at 2:15 for the pull-out program. Acceleration or self-contained multi-aged (for example 4th-6th) gifted rooms are a much better solution.

Myth or Fact: Gifted children will be fine regardless it’s much better to focus my attention on the students that need support.

Myth: As an educator, you have a commitment to all students. Gifted students have a high drop-out rate. Gifted students are also prone to feelings of isolation. With appropriate gifted programs, students are more likely to enter into STEM fields. Gifted programs are especially beneficial to low-income minority students who would have never furthered their education without the gifted programs foundation.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, it's not like you need a license to be Gifted! — Haga Mi Vida: I always wanted to be gifted.

hagamivida:

Just so we’re all clear on this, I have recently come to the conclusion that I might be gifted. My elementary school never had a gifted program. It didn’t even have special classes for the kids with severe mental problems like non-verbal autistic children (which they also hadn’t heard of. They were just deemed retarded, unfortunately). By the time I got to junior high and found out two of my friends were in gifted classes a few times a week, I was apparently too old to be tested. In high school I took International Baccalaureate classes instead of honors or AP, so that helped a bit, but I always felt stupid. Always. 

It’s strange to feel smarter than everyone and yet also feel like the dumbest person in the room. I still don’t understand how I can believe I am simultaneously both of those, but perhaps the Imposter Syndrome (posted below somewhere) explains it.

But being gifted seems to explain why I was a walking dictionary, growing up, and got made fun of sometimes for it. I would get so frustrated with people who would ask me instead of using a dictionary. It explains why I was talking, early, and made complex sentences long before most kids do. I didn’t know it was unusual until I took a course in psycholinguistics and learned about the stages of childhood L1 acquisition.

It explains my lightning-fast acquisition of Spanish despite never studying it. It might even explain my ability to mimic a Spanish accent (and several regional accents) so well without practicing. Ever. Maybe it explains how I learned about 10 tenses (tenses and conditionals) in about 15 minutes, including writing them all down, and never had to look them up afterward. There was a pattern. I saw it. It clicked.

It explains my frustration in elementary school when we had to read aloud and follow along. Everyone stumbled over words and couldn’t get the lilt in their voice right when they read sentences. It was painful. I always read ahead (and would sometimes be chapters ahead) and got yelled at.

My grades were average, save Spanish in high school. I out-scored the Spanish entrance test in college. If you got something like 350-494 points, you could start with 301 or go down to 202 if you weren’t sure you were ready for 301. I scored 540. I walked into 301, my second class of college ever, and was bored out of my mind. I called an adviser and begged to be moved up, but I wasn’t allowed. It was rather painful to sit through, but that was nothing out of the norm for me, unfortunately. I never studied, I never practiced, I skimmed the book in class when I absolutely had to. I had to sum up a story and do a skit with a partner - I skimmed it, wrote out what we’d say, sent it to him the night before, and we did it the next morning with no rehearsal. I got a 93% and a comment on my excellent speaking voice/accent. Yeah, no effort what-so-ever.

I feel like a fraud even thinking about claiming the title “gifted,” but it seems to make sense. I remember being so upset when I found out there was such a thing as gifted and that I wasn’t in the classes, too.

I always scored in the 95-99 percentile in the yearly standardized tests in reading and language related subjects, around the 75-85-ish percentiles in science related tests, and usually 30-60-ish percentiles in math. Always. And I’d try to get my friends to sit down and compare scores with me, but no one was ever very interested.

All right, enough soul searching for now. I think I am driving my co insane with my typing. Hi, Brenna.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union